Thanks for you suggestion, I'll look into adding that. Could you also make a github issue some I will not forget about it? You can make a github issue over here: https://github.com/jamovi/jamovi/issues. Thanks!

Cheers,

Ravi

Statistics: Posted by Ravi — Thu Feb 15, 2018 6:35 pm

]]>

I really appreciate everything you all are doing with the jamovi package, and thank you so much for everything you all have done so far.

I wanted to suggest, for the next jamovi updates, the possibility to calculating Tjur (pseudo) R-squared values for logistic regression models.

But Kvalseth (1985) argued that it’s actually preferable that R-squared not be based on a particular estimation method. In that way, it can legitimately be used to compare predictive power for models that generate their predictions using very different methods.

Cheers,

Maurizio

Statistics: Posted by MAgojam — Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:19 pm

]]>

Statistics: Posted by jonathon — Fri Feb 09, 2018 11:26 am

]]>

jonathon wrote:

go into the jamovi library -> installed, and see if you can remove 'jamovi' from the list.

Forgive me, but I realized only after sending the question, that jamovi was duplicated in the library.

Removed, now it's ok.

Thanks so much again.

Statistics: Posted by MAgojam — Fri Feb 09, 2018 11:18 am

]]>

go into the jamovi library -> installed, and see if you can remove 'jamovi' from the list.

jonathon

Statistics: Posted by jonathon — Fri Feb 09, 2018 10:46 am

]]>

It happens with jamovi 0.8.1.17 and .19, both win7pro and win10 (Italian).

See the attached picture. Menu Jamovi.png

Thanks for the great work.

Best regards.

Maurizio

Statistics: Posted by MAgojam — Fri Feb 09, 2018 10:43 am

]]>

2) we generally round to four significant figures, so the number of decimal places will depend on the numbers involved (which i think is a really nice behaviour), but you're right, this is an issue if a particular number of dps is required (we're psychologists too incidentally). you're not the first person to raise this, and it's something we're thinking through. we might provide an option where you can just specify "i want all numbers formatted to X decimal places", which is kinda ugly, but useful here.

there's an interesting dissociation between what's useful for *doing* statistics, vs *reporting* statistics. we don't provide a lot of opportunity for customizing plots at the moment, which is fine for *doing* statistics, but if you want to write a paper, that can be a problem. all this to say, we are gradually pivoting in that direction.

thanks for bringing this up.

jonathon

Statistics: Posted by jonathon — Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:50 pm

]]>

I love the work you are doing. The package "jmv" and the jamovi interface are wonderful. I often use the jmv package within R instead of through jamovi, but both are quite amazing.

I just had two suggestions:

(1) for Levene's test in an independent t test, one df is given, and the other is technically the df in the t test, but it is not provided in the Levene's test itself. In anova and onward, both df's are given. It could be good to offer the 2nd df in the t test as well.

(2) I come from a psychology background. Therefore, when rounding, it is great to see at least 2 if not 3 decimal places out for descriptives and the statistics. A few of your statistics/descriptives round it to one decimal place which makes it difficult to report in the format we often use in publications, conferences, etc. I'm not sure if this is an easy fix, but I just thought I would bring it up in case it is!

Once again, thanks for the great work. I appreciate what you all have put together!

Statistics: Posted by bhite38 — Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:34 pm

]]>

in case you missed it, we added row/column deletion a while back

cheers

jonathon

Statistics: Posted by jonathon — Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:35 am

]]>