so these are the calcs we use here:

https://github.com/jamovi/jmv/blob/mast ... #L536-L549

let us know if you still think there's an issue.

kind regards

jonathon

Statistics: Posted by jonathon — Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:57 am

]]>

Thanks for any help

Statistics: Posted by Huberth — Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:02 pm

]]>

https://github.com/jamovi/jamovi/issues

jonathon

Statistics: Posted by jonathon — Thu Jul 18, 2019 1:12 am

]]>

Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(863).

Statistics: Posted by ericcfields — Wed Jul 17, 2019 2:14 pm

]]>

]]>

]]>

still probably a couple of months away sorry. manually calculating the residuals should still be accurate though. it may display it rounded off, but the precision should be maintained 'under the hood'.

jonathon

Statistics: Posted by jonathon — Sat Jul 13, 2019 4:02 am

]]>

I also would like to have an update on this. We are switching from SPSS to Jamovi for a course starting in September. We are looking for a simpler way to save standardised residuals than using "Data > Compute" with formula = DVscore minus the prediction using the equation of the regression line" (which is by the way not very accurate because coefficients are rounded in the output)

Best wishes,

Marie

Statistics: Posted by mdelacre — Fri Jul 12, 2019 10:25 am

]]>

]]>

cheers

jonathon

Statistics: Posted by jonathon — Tue Jul 09, 2019 1:01 am

]]>

yeah, that's a great idea. as we're increasingly used with large datasets, i agree that can be an issue.

cheers

jonathon

Statistics: Posted by jonathon — Tue Jul 09, 2019 1:00 am

]]>

It would be useful to include a tool for variable filtering to use in the variable list window to select for estimation.

With many variables into a database, it takes a long time to scroll to the useful variables to perform the estimate.

There could be several ways to implement it.

For example, by right-clicking on the window that lists variables and giving the option to alphabetically order the variable list.

Another useful implementation is used by JGR, including a little window above the window that lists the variables, and in that little window, you can write the characters of the variables to filter. As a result, into the variable window are listed the variables matching to criterion.

Cheers!

Statistics: Posted by acescos — Fri Jul 05, 2019 8:28 pm

]]>

I come here to write a similar feature request and glad to see someone already did. It would be great to have this feature as soon as possible.

And as always, thank you guys for this great project.

Best,

T.E.G.

Note: As a terrible and crude workaround, I used Rj Editor to take notes between the analysis.

Statistics: Posted by tegedik — Fri Jul 05, 2019 11:38 am

]]>

it is great how many statistics you can have reported as the Additional options in the Correlation matrix. However, I found one missing and what would be really appreciated is the sample size. Just a simple N = XXX of cases in the given correlation.

Thanks for the great job you are doing!

Statistics: Posted by Vit — Thu Jul 04, 2019 8:30 am

]]>

]]>