Apologies - I've only just started looking at this again. Thanks for pushing it out!jonathon wrote: Tue May 19, 2026 11:38 pm we pushed out the 2.7.30 last night ... we'll give it a day or two for the dust to settle, and then we'll move it across to 'solid'.
Search found 89 matches
- Tue Jun 16, 2026 4:38 pm
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: Any idea when 2.7 will transition to 'Solid'
- Replies: 5
- Views: 144883
Re: Any idea when 2.7 will transition to 'Solid'
- Tue May 19, 2026 10:51 am
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: Any idea when 2.7 will transition to 'Solid'
- Replies: 5
- Views: 144883
Re: Any idea when 2.7 will transition to 'Solid'
i don't think we'll make 2.7 solid for a little while (we introduced some fairly substantial features recently, plot resizing, etc.) and so we're still waiting to see if there's any subtle bugs that emerge with that.
jonathon
Hi - is there any progression on moving the solid update version to 2 ...
- Thu Nov 27, 2025 6:38 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Condensing categorical variables
- Replies: 2
- Views: 51859
Re: Condensing categorical variables
Have you used numbers or text for the three categories in the participant responses?
- Thu Aug 21, 2025 12:41 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Just being curious... JASP vs jamovi
- Replies: 12
- Views: 210877
Re: Just being curious... JASP vs jamovi
Both platforms are good at what they do, but in my mind I view JASP as more suited for people who are either more experienced in stats and wish to make use of the litany of options per analysis, or else are very keen on the Bayesian outputs. Personally I prefer the understated elegance and interface ...
- Wed Feb 12, 2025 1:57 pm
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: installation of jamovi
- Replies: 2
- Views: 238483
Re: installation of jamovi
I get around this problem by downloading the *.zip file rather than the *.exe
- Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:06 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: R2 and adjusted R2 for simple linear regression
- Replies: 3
- Views: 170145
Re: R2 and adjusted R2 for simple linear regression
As I recall, R² reflects the proportion of the variance accounted for in your sample of participants, but the R²adj is for the population . I forget the exact formula, but the adjustment makes a more conservative estimate of this than the unadjusted R², and so the value you see in your analysis ...
- Thu Dec 12, 2024 3:30 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Help with understanding non-parametric tests
- Replies: 5
- Views: 76070
Re: Help with understanding non-parametric tests
"... count the number of hares it beats " - ha - I like that encapsulation!
As I recall, the rank biserial correlation does indeed reflect the ratio of participants in group#1 beating participants in group #2. It does this by ranking the scores of all your participants in both your groups - and ...
As I recall, the rank biserial correlation does indeed reflect the ratio of participants in group#1 beating participants in group #2. It does this by ranking the scores of all your participants in both your groups - and ...
- Thu Oct 03, 2024 2:00 pm
- Forum: Module development
- Topic: Module outliers (first attempt)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 87040
Re: Module outliers (first attempt)
This looks great! I particularly like the use of the histogram to visualise what these outliers look like - that should help students understand the concept better. Are the cut-offs typed in by the user - or can people choose from pre-selected options e.g. 1.96 / 3.29 etc...
+1 for the ability to ...
+1 for the ability to ...
- Mon Aug 19, 2024 1:16 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: Interpretation Help
- Replies: 1
- Views: 15593
Re: Interpretation Help
Try this: 

- Wed Jul 31, 2024 7:56 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: seolmatrix
- Replies: 7
- Views: 40287
Re: seolmatrix
What I've found is that many institutional computers have app blockers that may allow core aspects of jamovi to run while blocking other aspects. I've found that this blocking is especially likely to affect modules. Moreover, I've found seolmatrix to be more affected than any other jamovi module I ...