Can someone tell me why this happed or I'm doing something wrong.
HI, @Huberth.
The manual calculation of your RR is correct, but jamovi also correctly calculates RR .
Because RR in jamovi, corresponds to yours, it is necessary that in the first cell (A) the combination of the cases encoded with ...
Search found 3 matches
- Fri Jul 19, 2019 4:14 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Difference in Relative Risk
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11247
- Fri Jul 19, 2019 4:13 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Difference in Relative Risk
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11247
Re: Difference in Relative Risk
[quote="jonathon"]hey,
so these are the calcs we use here:
https://github.com/jamovi/jmv/blob/mast ... #L536-L549
Thank you very much, the formula is ok, its interesting to see the program part of the software
regards
Huberth
so these are the calcs we use here:
https://github.com/jamovi/jmv/blob/mast ... #L536-L549
Thank you very much, the formula is ok, its interesting to see the program part of the software
regards
Huberth
- Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:02 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Difference in Relative Risk
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11247
Difference in Relative Risk
Hi
I have a doubt with de Relative Risk, using Independent Samples (contingency tables). I was doing a homework and a I found that if a do it manually y got a different result from jamovi. I did a screenshot trying to be explanatory. Can someone tell me why this happed or I'm doing something wrong ...
I have a doubt with de Relative Risk, using Independent Samples (contingency tables). I was doing a homework and a I found that if a do it manually y got a different result from jamovi. I did a screenshot trying to be explanatory. Can someone tell me why this happed or I'm doing something wrong ...