Search found 456 matches
- Sat Dec 06, 2025 7:57 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Bug in Phi-Coefficient calculation or my mistake?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3247
Re: Bug in Phi-Coefficient calculation or my mistake?
Ciao Gianmarco , thank you for your authoritative contribution here. Regarding your new ChiSquaredTools module, I have forked your repository and in my release here: https://github.com/MAgojam/ChiSquaredTools/releases I have put the compiled .jmo file for Windows and for Linux for a sideload. If yo...
- Fri Dec 05, 2025 3:38 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Bug in Phi-Coefficient calculation or my mistake?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3247
Re: Bug in Phi-Coefficient calculation or my mistake?
Hey @sbeber, There is no bug , but rather a difference in the common definitions used for the Phi coefficient. Summary: The Pearson correlation gives a signed result, while the Chi-squared formula used in contingency tables gives the absolute value (unsigned). 1. Your Manual Result (Phi = -.287): Si...
- Mon Nov 17, 2025 9:18 am
- Forum: Module development
- Topic: Conditional cell colour-coding and decimal formatting - can both work together?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 16142
Re: Conditional cell colour-coding and decimal formatting - can both work together?
The screenshot I attached shows jamovi's built-in "Contingency Tables" analysis with the "Post Hoc Test (Pearson residuals)" option selected. The residual values in that table are clearly colour-coded - negative values appear in red (like -8.972 and -9.487) and positive values a...
- Sun Nov 16, 2025 3:33 pm
- Forum: Module development
- Topic: [Beta Testing] ChiSquaredTools - Post-Hoc Analysis Module
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11998
Re: [Beta Testing] ChiSquaredTools - Post-Hoc Analysis Module
Ciao Gianmarco, I greatly appreciate your decision to bring your chisquare package over as a dedicated jamovi module. I believe this module will garner significant interest once it is available in the library. I haven't been able to locate the module in your public repository; I would be keen to tak...
- Mon Sep 01, 2025 2:57 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: BOXCOX values
- Replies: 4
- Views: 30580
Re: BOXCOX values
I thought about the robust ANOVA, I´m just not sure whether it is possible to include the repeated measurements factor in this module of jamovi. I have to apologize for stumbling over my own code, anticipating an upcoming Walrus update with robust ANCOVA and RMANOVA, but it's not yet available in t...
- Mon Sep 01, 2025 7:44 am
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: BOXCOX values
- Replies: 4
- Views: 30580
Re: BOXCOX values
Hey Anni, just to give you some background: the BOXCOX() function you used in jamovi is actually implemented under the hood in Python (you can see the code here: https://github.com/jamovi/jamovi/blob/current-dev/server/jamovi/server/compute/functions.py#L305-L322 ). Knowing this can help to understa...
- Fri Aug 01, 2025 7:25 pm
- Forum: Module development
- Topic: Saving model persistently
- Replies: 3
- Views: 47625
Re: Saving model persistently
Hey @JavierMG, you can check it out here: https://github.com/jamovi/jmv/blob/master/R/ancova.b.R#L525 where we use it as @sbalci suggests. I've also put it here: https://github.com/jamovi/jmv/blob/master/R/anovanp.b.R#L52 So you can take a look at the code of the jmv analysis module elements. Cheers...
- Thu Jul 03, 2025 8:58 am
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: Chi square post hoc tests and correction for multiple testing
- Replies: 28
- Views: 311872
Re: Chi square post hoc tests and correction for multiple testing
So I would like to ask about that log-linear model as an alternative to chi square post hoc test, what are the advantages/benefits of using this ? Hey @Andrzej, Looks like you jumped in the time machine and traveled back, so did you miss out on this detail in another comment of mine that might answ...
- Tue Jul 01, 2025 10:23 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: Chi square post hoc tests and correction for multiple testing
- Replies: 28
- Views: 311872
Re: Chi square post hoc tests and correction for multiple testing
Hey @Andrzej_Andrew, Thank you for your follow-up and for sharing the video, it's a great point to clarify! Yes, the approach shown in the video, using adjusted residuals combined with a Bonferroni correction, is absolutely valid and widely used, especially in educational contexts or when you want t...
- Tue Jul 01, 2025 12:37 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: Chi square post hoc tests and correction for multiple testing
- Replies: 28
- Views: 311872
Re: Chi square post hoc tests and correction for multiple testing
Hey @Andrzej_Andrew, Thanks for your question about Bonferroni or Holm corrections for multiple comparisons in jamovi's chi-square test. In jamovi, after a significant chi-square test, the standard and most informative way to understand where the statistical differences lie within your contingency t...