jamovi

I agree. The Delete all option needs to have some safeguards. I can see the utility of the delete all function but in my opinion it is more dangerous than useful.

any update on this? No biggie just had some students running into the same problem again. hahahahaha Thanks y'all!

J

Cool, thanks Jonathon!

Screen Shot 2022-03-17 at 10.29.50 AM.png If I enter a continuous variable and name it with a single numeric digit like 1, and then I do a simple reverse score transform, the data in the resulting transformed variable is simply a string of all the same values. So I guess it is best to put a alpha ...

Awesome thanks Jonathon.

Hello-

Our campus has Version 1.6.x installed on 70 classroom computers.

Our IT department is not able to upgrade those machines to Version 2.x until this Summer.

Anything I should be worried about here? Will the older version still continue to work like normal until we upgrade this Summer ...

I'm with Frank on this one since it is somewhat challenging to sleuth out the modes in a distribution that has multiple modes (or close modes). The duplicate variable as ordinal is a workaround which I will teach in class but having a dedicated function for this would be nice. Just my two cents ...

This would be a nice feature to see in a future release! Thank you Jonathon.

Thanks so much, I will pass this info on to our IT team.

Justin

Not sure if the base set of analyses are compatible with version 2.0 yet?