jamovi

Hi. Thanks. To fix my example, there is only one item that is to be reverse-scored, and should be represented in my example as a column among several columns: 3243Untitled.png Yes, it ends up not mattering for correlation (reliability) computations because each column is ultimately converted to stan...

Well, my suggestion was just the opposite: Always do the reverse scoring based on the theoretical not the actual range.

RE "The choice of this adaptive method makes sense because the module cannot know the intended scale in advance." That's one way to look at it. But the way I see it, the only correct way to reverse-code is to base it on the theoretical, not the actual range of the data. For example, for -2...

Hi. I would suggest that you post a jamovi (.omv) file--not an image file--that shows the inconsistency.

I want to point out that paired-samples t tests are employed not only in pre-post situations, but also when the distinction between the two conditions isn't about time (e.g., left-hand performance versus right-hand performance). In addition, for some common dependent variables, good performance equa...

Yes, but it doesn't work if it's nominal text data . . .

For example: If you specified "0" and "1" with quotes, that would produce nominal data. Alternatively, if you specify 0 and 1 without quotes, that will produce numeric data.

Hi. You cannot sum nominal data. Can you share what you did, exactly, that produced the nominal data? You'll need to do things differently so that those data never become nominal.

Hi @HkVal
Is this what you're trying to do?
. . .

Are you saying that the exact same data, but with an older version of jamovi, yields non-overlapping curves?