jamovi

I would love to hear a justification for using unique error-terms for a BS factor while still using pooled for a WS factor, but even appearing to complain about free software is below (even) me. I might start to work on the R code. We'll see. In any event, thanks for the replies. ps. the best (IMO),...

Just to be clear about (the justification for) ignoring any between-subject factors when doing pairwise comparisons for a within-subjects main effect.... One would only conduct these pairwise tests when there are no interactions involving the within-subjects factor be the examined, including no inte...

Hi. Yes to the idea that they are all paired t-tests, preferably with Dunn-Sidak correction at least as an option, but No to the idea that any between-subject factors would be involved. Between-subject factors are ignored in this situation and the data are collapsed across (i.e., averaged across) an...

Thanks, but I'm asking for pairwise comparisons that use unique error-terms.

Please forgive me if this has been discussed before; I did search and could not find it. When conducting a set of pairwise comparisons (e.g., after finding a significant main effect), one has the choice of using an error-term that is based on all of the data (which will, therefore, be the same for a...