jamovi

Thanks a lot, Ravi, for looking into this. Glad that you could pinpointed the issue.
Yes, a warning text in the output about omitted cases would be very helpful.
Thanks again

Update: It seems that there is also something wrong with the alpha calculations? Notice for instance 'alpha when item dropped' for i04 in this screenshot: it says 0.64, while alpha for the whole scale is 0.74 jamovi_alpha.png However, if I remove i04 from the scale, alpha rises to 0.86 jamovi_alpha_...

Note: I downgraded to 2.3.38 with the same result.

Hi :-) There is a large discrepancy between the correlations I get using factor -> reliability -> 'correlations heatmap' and the ones I get using the standard menu (regression -> correlation matrix). See screenshots below. I have also attached the data file. Is this a bug, or is there something I do...

Sweet! Thanks Maurizio! (what a coincidence, I had not seen the other post, but it seemed you just announced this feature a few days back) Here is the most basic example, in case somebody needs it [EDIT: I have cut it down to one line - I originally had an unnecessary line] data <- cbind(data, my_su...

Hi What would be the best way to define recurring recoding / computations outside of jamovis compute/recode UI, and have the resulting variables saved into jamovi's spreadsheet data frame? I have tried using the Rj (Rj+) module, but I can't figure out a way to save new variables back into jamovi (ma...