great, thanks for pointing to this
I had put it in the glossary before...
https://hosted.weblate.org/browse/jamov ... translated
cheers
Search found 20 matches
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 11:53 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Polish translation mistake in chi-square
- Replies: 9
- Views: 13814
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 12:56 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Polish translation mistake in chi-square
- Replies: 9
- Views: 13814
Re: Polish translation mistake in chi-square
Hi jonathon, the way I put in in weblate may be erroneous (did not use special characters - just square brackets for [chi-square] phrase) but the translations are correct. To be quite honest "chi-square goodness-of-fit" is currently translated as "chi-kwadrat test dobroci dopasowania&...
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 3:57 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Polish translation mistake in chi-square
- Replies: 9
- Views: 13814
Re: Polish translation mistake in chi-square
Hi, I would like to ask how often are translations exchanged for corrected ones? Is it only in stable versions? Or had I posted it wrongly on the forum @jonathon indicated? I did it about 3 months ago, several updates of jamovi since, but still I have to tell students (very happy to have jamovi to m...
- Fri Dec 22, 2023 6:01 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: using Mann-Whitney / Wilcoxon tests for ordinal data
- Replies: 3
- Views: 20841
Re: using Mann-Whitney / Wilcoxon tests for ordinal data
Right. I was asking why ordinal data is not allowed - that is, the windows for selecting dependent variables for these tests (found under t-tests) does not accept ordinal data. I know this all is under t-tests menu, but it could be be e.g. independent samples t-test & Mann-Whitney). Similarly no...
- Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:40 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Excluding multiple rows with one filter
- Replies: 9
- Views: 29445
Re: Excluding multiple rows with one filter
Is there a method to filter multiple rows by number with one filter? e.g. ROW()!=25 works fine, but if you want to filter out many rows, can you do this in one filter? (e.g. ROW()!=c(25, 35, 33, 53, 23) does not work..) I only know that separate filters for every value work - cannot find shorter met...
- Wed Dec 06, 2023 5:10 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Could "continuous" be replaced with another word?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 52703
Re: Could "continuous" be replaced with another word?
Either "interval/ratio" or "quantitative" is formally better IMO ;) I would not count ordinal as quantitative, just as ranks. But interval/ratio is even better suited for beginners. Explaining why "continuous" means "quantitative" takes some time as continuous...
- Wed Dec 06, 2023 4:46 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: using Mann-Whitney / Wilcoxon tests for ordinal data
- Replies: 3
- Views: 20841
using Mann-Whitney / Wilcoxon tests for ordinal data
Is there a way to use Mann-Whitney (independent groups) or Wilcoxon (paired samples) for ordinal dependent variables? This is possible for Kruskal-Wallis, as the dialog box accepts ordinal data. Not possible for Friedman test, though. As I understand the only way is to redefine an ordinal variable a...
- Tue Dec 05, 2023 11:41 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: small feature suggestions for ANOVAs (Ns and eff size)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 13652
Re: small feature suggestions for ANOVAs (Ns and eff size)
There is also a classic ANOVA option for one-way.
If there is no agreement on what to use for Welch's, then it needn't have one.
If there is no agreement on what to use for Welch's, then it needn't have one.
- Tue Dec 05, 2023 7:34 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: small feature suggestions for ANOVAs (Ns and eff size)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 13652
small feature suggestions for ANOVAs (Ns and eff size)
Hello, jamovi is great for intro statistics. The handiness of many options, e.g. assumption checks for tests within test menus is great. :relaxed: Normally for t-tests and one-way anova, it's easy to see descriptives including Ns for compared groups. Not so for (factorial) ANOVA - could it be added ...
- Sun Dec 03, 2023 8:51 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: [RESOLVED] Normality assumption
- Replies: 19
- Views: 40198
Re: [RESOLVED] Normality assumption
That's true, Z-scores calculated for two groups separately eliminate the difference in variances which is present in raw scores and is the source of trouble.