jamovi

Very helpful, and something that I hadn't heard much about, not being a Bayesian analysis expert. I had no idea that different methods could lead to such a wild range of results: from a BF=2 (consistent with the standard NHT ANOVA results) to a BF>10^7 :/ Is the moral that we just shouldn't rely on ...

Hi, I'm attaching the .omv file (zipped). The Bayesian ANOVA is at the bottom of the Results section. IRRPRO should have a BF10 around 2 or so, but it's 10^7 ...

Thanks much for looking into this.

-Phil

Hi, I noticed strange results with a Bayesian RM ANOVA with two factors (2 and 11 levels, respectively). The attachment shows the results, compared with those obtained with JASP, and the are major discrepancies. It looks like something is not working properly in the JSQ module in Jamovi. :thinking: ...