Search found 194 matches
- Tue Jul 11, 2023 11:39 am
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Path diagram in CFA
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1789
Re: Path diagram in CFA
I think that probably the path between 7 and 8 is missing because the items overlap and therefore occlude the path that is drawn between them. I expect that if it were possible to increase the height of the plot (which is not possible in jamovi at the moment), the path between 7 and 8 would show up ...
- Fri Jun 16, 2023 1:30 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: How can I fix these three issues? - Reliability Analysis & Principal Component Analysis
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2883
Re: How can I fix these three issues? - Reliability Analysis & Principal Component Analysis
Hi Deniz, Maurizio is indeed right that in your first example ("Car_Level 1", "Car2_Level 1", "Car3_Level 1", and "Car4_Level 1") only 1 row/case remains after deleting all the missing values (jamovi uses listwise deletion in the reliability analysis), and as ...
- Tue May 16, 2023 11:58 am
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Problem with binomial logistic regression
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2808
Re: Problem with binomial logistic regression
So in terms of what's going wrong in the model is that it seems that the data you are using in the model are highly collinear resulting in a singular fit. You can see in the data that the `CP not having` level of `rec_owningageCP` and the `Non-use` level of `Rec_use_years` only occur together (and n...
- Tue Nov 15, 2022 10:36 am
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Error running jmv::anovaRM with a between-subj interaction
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1660
Re: Error running jmv::anovaRM with a between-subj interacti
FYI, it looks like the promotion from warning to error happened in R 4.2.0. From the release notes:
Calling if() or while() with a condition of length greater than one gives an error rather than a warning...
- Tue Nov 15, 2022 10:33 am
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Error running jmv::anovaRM with a between-subj interaction
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1660
Re: Error running jmv::anovaRM with a between-subj interacti
Hi Brad, Thank you for the bug report! I found out where the issue is and fixed it in this pull request: https://github.com/jamovi/jmv/pull/364. On my version of R (4.0.2) only a warning is given, so one of the later R versions probably promoted these types of issues to an error instead of a warning...
- Tue Aug 30, 2022 8:02 am
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: Factor scores
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7538
Re: Factor scores
Are you talking about the EFA? Because in EFA it's already possible to export factor scores.
- Tue Aug 30, 2022 8:00 am
- Forum: Help
- Topic: MAJOR -Cooks distance rslts different RR vs OR - bug or math
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2656
Re: MAJOR -Cooks distance rslts different RR vs OR - bug or
Ah yeah, I didn't realize you were talking about the MAJOR module. It's probably best to contact the developer of the MAJOR module, Kyle Hamilton (https://kylehamilton.com/), because I don't know much about his analysis.
- Tue Aug 23, 2022 9:59 am
- Forum: Help
- Topic: MAJOR -Cooks distance rslts different RR vs OR - bug or math
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2656
Re: MAJOR -Cooks distance rslts different RR or OR - bug or
So what specific analysis are you talking about here?
- Tue Aug 23, 2022 8:56 am
- Forum: jamovi development
- Topic: EFA based on covariance/ unstandardized results
- Replies: 3
- Views: 14786
Re: EFA based on covariance/ unstandardized results
Hi Abdullah, Could you share the use case with us? Adding an options to do this is technically very easy, but we're always focussed on keeping an analysis as simple as possible so that beginner users are not overwhelmed by options that almost nobody uses. But of course, if this is an options that is...
- Tue Aug 23, 2022 8:17 am
- Forum: Help
- Topic: MAJOR -Cooks distance rslts different RR vs OR - bug or math
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2656
Re: MAJOR -Cooks distance rslts different RR or OR - bug or
Hi Achilleas, I'm not sure what you mean with "OR" and "RR" but if you fit different types of models the cook's distance is gonna be different because it is dependent on the model.
Cheers,
Ravi
Cheers,
Ravi