jamovi

Sorry but I can't provide my stata file... Yes, I see! So, since you know and use R, I'd suggest you try this: require(jmvReadWrite) jmvReadWrite::convert_to_omv(fleInp = 'x:/Stata17/dta/auto.dta', fleOut = 'x:/jamovi/omv/auto.omv') my_omv <- jmvReadWrite::read_omv(fleInp = 'x:/jamovi/omv/auto.omv'...

Hey @neck_dvvp,
this looks like a Python msg.
It might be that you need to update your version of jamovi.
We are currently with 2.3.28 solid and 2.4.1 current.
However if you don't mind providing your Stata file I might take a look.

Cheers,
Maurizio

Hey @madelinestein,
if you could provide a file with data producing your findings, i might take a look, before answering.

Cheers,
Maurizio

drm wrote: ↑Fri Jun 23, 2023 9:19 am Other advanced options in the MAJOR module such as trim and fill and so forth would be great!

Hey Daniel,
May I ask you to take a look here:
viewtopic.php?t=2607

there is an answer from me to another MAJOR user that could also apply to your request.

Cheers,
Maurizio

Hey Natalie, sorry for the delay here, but for MAJOR there are already a lot of my answers in the forum. W. Kyle Hamilton, he's the author of MAJOR, but we haven't seen him around here for a long time now and that's why I've posted on this awesome form to fix reported bugs and add some requests, eve...

Hi @drfuad,
you have a cross between "Institutional Delivery" and "CS", with No data.
Take a look at the screenshot. Cheers,
Maurizio

Hey Dan, there are, but my friend Jth preceded me in answering ( from him the light comes before from us :') ). Perhaps you may find it useful (if you haven't already) to have a look here at the ancova.b.R code for setting a reference on a condition: https://github.com/jamovi/jmv/blob/master/R/ancov...

The analysis is in the folder "nonpara" and is called "signtest" (NOT signrank). Hey Dan, it seems to me that the references in your first post are in favor of wilcoxranksum . So I played with the code in WRS and sent a PR with the small changes. Feel free to decline it. Cheers,...

jonathon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2023 1:28 am mz might chime in on this.

Here I am.

I took a look on the fly.
By inserting the 4th variable 'Car 4_Level 1' the refresh of the data exits the (car wash ) with a single observation...

Cheers,
Maurizio

Hey @erosenzweig,
if you take a look at the screenshots in the posts above, you will see that you need == (you only used one) for the formula to be correct and get the result you are looking for.

Cheers,
Maurizio