Search found 288 matches

by reason180
Wed Mar 13, 2024 10:11 pm
Forum: Off-topic
Topic: What's the chance I can get ChatGPT to turn my R function into a jamovi module?
Replies: 2
Views: 3332

Re: What's the chance I can get ChatGPT to turn my R function into a jamovi module?

It has not worked. The best chatGPT has done is to simply return pieces of your tutorial.
by reason180
Wed Mar 13, 2024 2:54 am
Forum: Off-topic
Topic: What's the chance I can get ChatGPT to turn my R function into a jamovi module?
Replies: 2
Views: 3332

What's the chance I can get ChatGPT to turn my R function into a jamovi module?

I wonder, what's the chance I can get ChatGPT to turn my R function into a jamovi module? :-)
by reason180
Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:30 pm
Forum: Statistics
Topic: Alternative to Mann-Whitney U-test for very small samples sizes?
Replies: 5
Views: 1256

Re: Alternative to Mann-Whitney U-test for very small samples sizes?

Would the requirement for "some kind of statistical analysis" be satisfied by sample-descriptive rather than population-inferential statistics? For example: "The median rank was 4.0 for Group A and 2.0 for Group B. The effect size, calculated as the rank biserial correlation (rank vs....
by reason180
Sat Mar 09, 2024 1:16 pm
Forum: Statistics
Topic: Alternative to Mann-Whitney U-test for very small samples sizes?
Replies: 5
Views: 1256

Re: Alternative to Mann-Whitney U-test for very small samples sizes?

So you have only three subjects in each of two groups, with ranks being constrained to 1-through-6? I think that since you're starting with ranks rather than interval/ordinal data, the U test is already sufficiently powerful. I'm afraid that three rank-scores per group just isn't enough for drawing ...
by reason180
Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:14 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Sphericity violation in RM Anova
Replies: 3
Views: 1050

Re: Sphericity violation in RM Anova

OK. But the 'homogenous variance' assumption doesn't apply to repeated-measures factors (it only applies to between-subject factors). And even if you had a between-subject design rather than a repeated-measures design, it would make no sense to ask whether there is a significant difference between t...
by reason180
Thu Mar 07, 2024 10:06 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Sphericity violation in RM Anova
Replies: 3
Views: 1050

Re: Sphericity violation in RM Anova

Hi. It is not possible to calculate sphericity separately for each of the levels of your four-level repeated-measures ANOVA. Sphericity is a characteristic of the entire model, not of any particular level of the repeated-measures factor. Also, Welch's ANOVA is for between-subjects factors only. it c...
by reason180
Thu Mar 07, 2024 5:59 am
Forum: Help
Topic: Kolmogorov-Smirnov for a repeated measures ANOVA
Replies: 2
Views: 1135

Re: Kolmogorov-Smirnov for a repeated measures ANOVA

Hi. The description accompanying the moretests module includes a list of analyses that will yield more tests. Repeated-measures ANOVA isn't in that list. So perhaps the person who claimed to use moretests with repeated-measures ANOVA was mistaken.
by reason180
Sun Mar 03, 2024 11:07 pm
Forum: Help
Topic: Non-conformable arguments
Replies: 6
Views: 1435

Re: Non-conformable arguments

Hi. You have a very large number of missing cells in the ANOVA design . Even leaving-out social media use, you would need to have at least two people in each of the 12 cells indicated below. However, your Non-Binary Freshman cell is missing (there are zero people in that cell), your Non-Binary Sopho...
by reason180
Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:59 pm
Forum: Help
Topic: Non-conformable arguments
Replies: 6
Views: 1435

Re: Non-conformable arguments

Note that in this example, the spreadsheet's "ii, ii, ii" data are missing.
hswUntitled.png
hswUntitled.png (128.45 KiB) Viewed 1427 times
by reason180
Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:51 pm
Forum: Help
Topic: Non-conformable arguments
Replies: 6
Views: 1435

Re: Non-conformable arguments

First of all, the sums of squares type should normally be Type III (the default) instead of Type I. But more importantly, to run an ANOVA, you cannot have missing cells in your "Gender" by "College Classification" by "Media Use" design. Apparently you are missing some c...