Search found 285 matches
- Sat Feb 17, 2024 3:34 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: 2x2 factorial design. Need post hoc test in this case?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2443
Re: 2x2 factorial design. Need post hoc test in this case?
RE: "Since you have a strong interaction, then the main effects (specially for sex) could be marginal (secondary) to the interaction. This is known as the principle of marginality. In your example you may not be able to claim that women in general perform better than men, only those women who w...
- Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:30 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: "Split file" command
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1222
Re: "Split file" command
Unfortunately jamovi can't 'split file.' To accomplish what you want, you can either do what you've already done (separate files), or you can use filtering to temporarily remove one sex or the other, or you can use Computed Variables to create two separate additional columns: DV_ForMalesOnly and DVF...
- Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:23 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: 2x2 factorial design. Need post hoc test in this case?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2443
Re: 2x2 factorial design. Need post hoc test in this case?
You wrote "There´s an interaction effect where being female and walking yields a higher test score (than being female and biking and being man and biking or walking respectively." That may be true, but it isn't a description of an interaction. The interaction is that the change in the mean...
- Tue Feb 13, 2024 10:43 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Removing missing data
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1492
Re: Removing missing data
Or: If your large data set has a manageable number of variables, you could just write a command in the jamovi filter that has the effect of filtering-in only complete rows. Then you could export the data as a csv file (any rows not-filtered-in will be dropped), and then open the csv in jamovi.
- Sun Feb 11, 2024 7:14 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Removing missing data
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1492
Re: Removing missing data
It may not be possible to do this strictly within jamovi. In R you could execute the expression: data <- data[complete.cases(data), ] (The above assumes that you already have a data frame named: data) Using jamovi's Rj+ you could execute: df<- data[complete.cases(data), ] but then you would need to ...
- Mon Feb 05, 2024 4:45 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: Weights
- Replies: 4
- Views: 20893
Re: Weights
If you use large integers (e.g., weights: 666666666, 333333333) won't that suffice?
- Tue Jan 30, 2024 3:02 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: What should we do about having given "shotguns to toddlers"? (Linear Mixed-Effects)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 22029
Re: What should we do about having given "shotguns to toddlers"? (Linear Mixed-Effects)
Yes. Thanks for the correction.
- Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:24 pm
- Forum: Module development
- Topic: Seeking general advice: to duplicate or not to duplicate existing functionality
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1816
Seeking general advice: to duplicate or not to duplicate existing functionality
I've created an R function for producing a particular style of editable, rich data plot. In the not-too-distant future I would to turn it into jamovi module. It could be a stand-alone module. Or in principle it could be something that somehow gets added onto jamovi's existing ANOVA, repeated-measure...
- Sun Jan 21, 2024 4:22 am
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: Comparing two sigmoideal curves. Seeking advice.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2569
Re: Comparing two sigmoideal curves. Seeking advice.
I think a rather complex approach would be to assume that each of the two functions is indeed sigmoidal, find and apply a transformation that appears to mostly linearize the functions, then use multiple regression to ascertain whether the slope for the orientation-by-stimulus interaction is signific...
- Sat Jan 20, 2024 3:27 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: How determine numbers of trials to reach a good SEM
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2127
Re: How determine numbers of trials to reach a good SEM
Also note that, like an effect size, the standard error of measurement (SEm) does not change systematically with sample size. So adding or subtracting trials will not tend to make the SEm more 'good' or less 'good.'