My version of jamovi (1.0.5.0) is telling me that it is rather old (like its user). When I try to download the 'solid' version (1.1.9), I get rejection messages and don't seem to be able to download.
Firefox says 'Secure Connection Failed'. Edge 'Can't Read This Page.
Search found 43 matches
- Thu Feb 20, 2020 4:41 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: update problem
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3616
- Sun Dec 15, 2019 10:22 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Transforming variables and other improvements
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1578
Re: Transforming variables and other improvements
With regards to your 3rd point. It depends. If you want to do it merely so that it is familiar to SPSS users, then it is only a short-term advantage. Personally, I think that having the parametric test and its non-parametric equivalent together makes sense: if when you run a parametric test, you fin...
- Fri Nov 01, 2019 2:14 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: Testing Normality of Residuals in Repeated and Mixed ANOVA
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7436
Re: Testing Normality of Residuals in Repeated and Mixed ANO
I think that trouble (or virtue?) is that statistical tests have been developed in diverse ways. Various tests were created by psychologists, not mathematicians. Others, such as survival analysis, have different names because of applications in various academic fields (where it becomes event or dura...
- Fri Nov 01, 2019 1:55 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: Mann Whitney U - Mean Rank Values
- Replies: 3
- Views: 11026
Re: Mann Whitney U - Mean Rank Values
I think you need to add up the ranking values for each level and divide the sum by the number of cases in that level. So, you'll get two figures which I think would be correct.
- Sat Sep 14, 2019 4:55 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Hosmer-Lemeshow test for binary logistic regression?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2669
Re: Hosmer-Lemeshow test for binary logistic regression?
This test has its critics:
https://statisticalhorizons.com/hosmer-lemeshow
https://statisticalhorizons.com/hosmer-lemeshow
- Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:29 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: Choice of effect size for Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon tests
- Replies: 30
- Views: 64274
Re: Choice of effect size for Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon tests
For what it's worth, I believe that Hedges' g is preferred to Cohen's d where there are less than 20 cases.
- Mon Aug 26, 2019 9:54 am
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: stepwise regression
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6969
Re: stepwise regression
I cover some of this in my books. In short, I would say that in these days of easy computing, I would agree that the use of stepwise regression for the usual purposes is not particularly ethical. Even if you wanted to use it for whittling down data, wouldn't factor analysis be more useful and valid....
- Mon Aug 26, 2019 9:41 am
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner pairwise comparisons
- Replies: 13
- Views: 24636
Re: Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner pairwise comparisons
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10. ... 9108830487
I believe that family-wise error rate is built in.
I believe that family-wise error rate is built in.
- Wed Jul 17, 2019 11:38 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: omega squared
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2864
Re: omega squared
It can be done, but is a bit more complicated to produce than the between subjects version. I've got it in Cole Davis (2019) 'Statistical Testing with R' (Vor Press, copyright 2019), but I'll send the jamovi team the code.
- Tue Jun 11, 2019 1:08 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Effect size of a Kruskal-Wallis test
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6306
Re: Effect size of a Kruskal-Wallis test
You're welcome. Other relevant material on this webpage: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Anyone_know_how_to_calculate_eta_squared_for_a_Kruskal-Wallis_analysis The original Tomczak and Tomczak article can be found here: https://www.academia.edu/10618805/The_need_to_report_effect_size_estimates_rev...