Search found 282 matches
- Thu Mar 07, 2024 5:59 am
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Kolmogorov-Smirnov for a repeated measures ANOVA
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1061
Re: Kolmogorov-Smirnov for a repeated measures ANOVA
Hi. The description accompanying the moretests module includes a list of analyses that will yield more tests. Repeated-measures ANOVA isn't in that list. So perhaps the person who claimed to use moretests with repeated-measures ANOVA was mistaken.
- Sun Mar 03, 2024 11:07 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Non-conformable arguments
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1354
Re: Non-conformable arguments
Hi. You have a very large number of missing cells in the ANOVA design . Even leaving-out social media use, you would need to have at least two people in each of the 12 cells indicated below. However, your Non-Binary Freshman cell is missing (there are zero people in that cell), your Non-Binary Sopho...
- Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:59 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Non-conformable arguments
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1354
Re: Non-conformable arguments
Note that in this example, the spreadsheet's "ii, ii, ii" data are missing.
- Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:51 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Non-conformable arguments
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1354
Re: Non-conformable arguments
First of all, the sums of squares type should normally be Type III (the default) instead of Type I. But more importantly, to run an ANOVA, you cannot have missing cells in your "Gender" by "College Classification" by "Media Use" design. Apparently you are missing some c...
- Thu Feb 29, 2024 6:11 am
- Forum: Module development
- Topic: Apparently broken: jReshape (Version 0.2.2 and 0.2.4, with jamovi 2.4.14 for Windows), Wide to Long, Advanced
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1016
Apparently broken: jReshape (Version 0.2.2 and 0.2.4, with jamovi 2.4.14 for Windows), Wide to Long, Advanced
jReshape (Version 0.2.2 and 0.2.4, with jamovi 2.4.14 for Windows) Wide to Long, Advanced, appears to be broken. In the attached example, attempting to reshape RT and Accuracy columns to Long format produces the following error when it should not: 'lengths(varying)' must all match 'length(times)' Te...
- Mon Feb 19, 2024 9:45 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: How to Exclude Multiple Values in Data Variable
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1022
Re: How to Exclude Multiple Values in Data Variable
(ParticipantID != 3) and (ParticipantID != 4)
- Mon Feb 19, 2024 5:10 am
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Error when attempting a factorial ANOVA
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1109
Re: Error when attempting a factorial ANOVA
Maybe you don't actually have a complete factorial design. In a similar example, below, there's a 1,1 and a 2,2 condition, but no 1,2 and no 2,1 condition. Therefore, no ANOVA results.
- Sat Feb 17, 2024 3:34 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: 2x2 factorial design. Need post hoc test in this case?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2389
Re: 2x2 factorial design. Need post hoc test in this case?
RE: "Since you have a strong interaction, then the main effects (specially for sex) could be marginal (secondary) to the interaction. This is known as the principle of marginality. In your example you may not be able to claim that women in general perform better than men, only those women who w...
- Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:30 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: "Split file" command
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1185
Re: "Split file" command
Unfortunately jamovi can't 'split file.' To accomplish what you want, you can either do what you've already done (separate files), or you can use filtering to temporarily remove one sex or the other, or you can use Computed Variables to create two separate additional columns: DV_ForMalesOnly and DVF...
- Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:23 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: 2x2 factorial design. Need post hoc test in this case?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2389
Re: 2x2 factorial design. Need post hoc test in this case?
You wrote "There´s an interaction effect where being female and walking yields a higher test score (than being female and biking and being man and biking or walking respectively." That may be true, but it isn't a description of an interaction. The interaction is that the change in the mean...