Search found 462 matches
- Thu Oct 12, 2023 4:11 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: GLM Mediation Model not running properly
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8256
Re: GLM Mediation Model not running properly
I cannot find it
- Thu Oct 12, 2023 8:35 am
- Forum: Help
- Topic: GLM Mediation Model not running properly
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8256
Re: GLM Mediation Model not running properly
Would you share the .omv file so I can check what is going on? If you prefer, you can send it by email.
- Wed Oct 11, 2023 6:03 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: GLM Mediation Model not running properly
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8256
Re: GLM Mediation Model not running properly
Hi
first, please set the ID_* variable to be "continuous" in the data tab. If the problem persists, tell us and we find a solution
first, please set the ID_* variable to be "continuous" in the data tab. If the problem persists, tell us and we find a solution
- Tue Oct 03, 2023 12:31 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: No R-squared values Mixed model
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6730
Re: No R-squared values Mixed model
Be sure you are in the latest version of the module. I simply opened your example and changed the type of variable.
- Tue Oct 03, 2023 6:32 am
- Forum: Help
- Topic: No R-squared values Mixed model
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6730
Re: No R-squared values Mixed model
set V2 as a Nominal variable (as it should be) and it works
- Thu Sep 28, 2023 8:20 am
- Forum: Module development
- Topic: GAMLj ¼ broken after recent jamovi update?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 11585
Re: GAMLj ¼ broken after recent jamovi update?
thanks Alex
- Sat Sep 23, 2023 10:30 am
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: Selecting reference level for a transformed variable
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6640
Re: Selecting reference level for a transformed variable
Hi That depends on what transformation you use and whether your transformed variable is a dependent variable or an independent variable. If you are doing a recode, in the same way you change the order of the levels for non-transformed variable, you can change the order of the recode conditions (&quo...
- Tue Sep 19, 2023 8:20 pm
- Forum: Module development
- Topic: misscalculation of predicted factor scores in SEM
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6841
Re: misscalculation of predicted factor scores in SEM
if you are in SEMLj 1.1.7 and it does not work, I'd ask to share an example so I can work it out, because in my system works fine. If you prefer, you can send a .omv file via email
- Tue Sep 19, 2023 11:19 am
- Forum: Module development
- Topic: misscalculation of predicted factor scores in SEM
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6841
Re: misscalculation of predicted factor scores in SEM
HI yes, it was a bug. It has been fixed in the new version 1.1.7, which is coming out. You'll see now that cases with some missing in the observed variables will have all predicted values missing if you select "missing listwise", whereas the cases will have missing only in the predicted va...
- Mon Sep 18, 2023 5:52 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: Urgent - I cannot find the values of sandardized coefficient in Mixed model
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7303
Re: Urgent - I cannot find the values of sandardized coefficient in Mixed model
There is no consensus on how to standardize coefficients in mixed model, as indicated by the fact that no other software produce them. We are waiting for the literature (a solid literature) to reach some consensus on this topic.