Search found 467 matches
- Thu Sep 28, 2023 8:20 am
- Forum: Module development
- Topic: GAMLj ¼ broken after recent jamovi update?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 12056
Re: GAMLj ¼ broken after recent jamovi update?
thanks Alex
- Sat Sep 23, 2023 10:30 am
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: Selecting reference level for a transformed variable
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7157
Re: Selecting reference level for a transformed variable
Hi That depends on what transformation you use and whether your transformed variable is a dependent variable or an independent variable. If you are doing a recode, in the same way you change the order of the levels for non-transformed variable, you can change the order of the recode conditions (&quo...
- Tue Sep 19, 2023 8:20 pm
- Forum: Module development
- Topic: misscalculation of predicted factor scores in SEM
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6890
Re: misscalculation of predicted factor scores in SEM
if you are in SEMLj 1.1.7 and it does not work, I'd ask to share an example so I can work it out, because in my system works fine. If you prefer, you can send a .omv file via email
- Tue Sep 19, 2023 11:19 am
- Forum: Module development
- Topic: misscalculation of predicted factor scores in SEM
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6890
Re: misscalculation of predicted factor scores in SEM
HI yes, it was a bug. It has been fixed in the new version 1.1.7, which is coming out. You'll see now that cases with some missing in the observed variables will have all predicted values missing if you select "missing listwise", whereas the cases will have missing only in the predicted va...
- Mon Sep 18, 2023 5:52 pm
- Forum: Statistics
- Topic: Urgent - I cannot find the values of sandardized coefficient in Mixed model
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7776
Re: Urgent - I cannot find the values of sandardized coefficient in Mixed model
There is no consensus on how to standardize coefficients in mixed model, as indicated by the fact that no other software produce them. We are waiting for the literature (a solid literature) to reach some consensus on this topic.
- Tue Sep 12, 2023 10:20 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Contrast coding - are these correct?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 781
Re: Contrast coding - are these correct?
please check the original post
- Tue Sep 12, 2023 10:18 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Contrasts - Repeated - Contrast coefficient table
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6627
Re: Contrasts - Repeated - Contrast coefficient table
Hi I do confirm that the repeated contrast does compare 1-2, 2-3, 3-4 and so on. That is why you get the same estimates across different software. The difference between GAMLj in jamovi and other software is that in GAMLj the repeated contrasts are defined not only to compare the subsequent means as...
- Mon Sep 11, 2023 2:20 pm
- Forum: Module development
- Topic: make a 2nd order model
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6992
Re: make a 2nd order model
Assume you already defined three factors named X, Y and M, you do this and define a second order factor
- Fri Sep 08, 2023 5:25 pm
- Forum: Help
- Topic: P value of the mixed model
- Replies: 2
- Views: 888
Re: P value of the mixed model
Hi not in the current version. However, version 3 is in preview here (https://github.com/gamlj/gamlj#version-3) and does the overall model test. You just download the package from the links there and then sideload into jamovi (see instructions in the linked page). You need to re-run the models, beca...
- Thu Sep 07, 2023 8:54 pm
- Forum: Module development
- Topic: GAMLj Feature Request: Simple Interaction Effects
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6199
Re: GAMLj Feature Request: Simple Interaction Effects
The new update of gamlj, version 3, allows for simple interactions of any order. However, it is not yet in the jamovi library, but you can download and sideload in jamovi with very simple steps: check it out here https://github.com/gamlj/gamlj#version-3 Please give feedback so we can move it to the ...