Mixed Models Module

Everything related to the development of modules in jamovi
User avatar
MAgojam
Posts: 421
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:33 pm
Location: Parma (Italy)

Re: Mixed Models Module

Post by MAgojam »

mcfanda@gmail.com wrote: I pushed a new master (0.9.7) with the last version of .nicifyTerm() as you suggested. In linux works well, it should be ok in other OS too.
It also works well with windows 7 and 10.

Cheers,
Maurizio
Farscape
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:04 pm

Re: Mixed Models Module

Post by Farscape »

Hi Marcello,

Thanks once again for your software. I have a question regarding your calculation of CI for the multinomial regression. I am getting different 95% CI when I run your module vs. when I run the multinom regression in R and SPSS. I am using multinom function in r.

Thanks,
User avatar
mcfanda@gmail.com
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:24 pm

Re: Mixed Models Module

Post by mcfanda@gmail.com »

Hi, thanks for the suggestion. Do you have a working example that I can check? In the meantime, please consider that the way you compute the CI for glm() models may influence the results. GAMLj relies on R emmeans package, which does not necessarely uses the exact same approach of other packages.

To give you a concrete example, I've noticed myself that emmeans CI are different (not drammatically) from confint() function CI in logistic regression. I was puzzled and I asked the emmeans developers. Their swift reply was quite convincing. Maybe we are talking about something similar here. Please check out https://github.com/rvlenth/emmeans/issues/7
Farscape
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:04 pm

Re: Mixed Models Module

Post by Farscape »

Thanks for the link! That might be the case since I used confint() function.
User avatar
mcfanda@gmail.com
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:24 pm

Re: Mixed Models Module

Post by mcfanda@gmail.com »

Good, please let us know if you see any other discrepancy
oguncak
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2019 2:20 pm

Re: Mixed Models Module

Post by oguncak »

is it possible to add factor loading values into path diagram as in amos?
User avatar
mcfanda@gmail.com
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:24 pm

Re: Mixed Models Module

Post by mcfanda@gmail.com »

Hi, it's not clear to me how you would add factor loadinga to a mixed model. If you intend mixed SEM, they are not implemented in gamlj, and it would take a while before we do that. Almost certainly, they will be in a different module.
hejhej
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:46 am

Re: Mixed Models Module

Post by hejhej »

First, thank you so much for the module!

Would it be possible to also add effect sizes to the mixed models? Perhaps along the lines of Feingold (JCCP 2011, 2015)?
User avatar
mcfanda@gmail.com
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:24 pm

Re: Mixed Models Module

Post by mcfanda@gmail.com »

We are working on this. Most likely, we will use effect sizes based on variances, because the d is applicable to a much smaller variety of designs
Post Reply