Hi,
On windows the shortcode of a transformation is not used exactly. This is confusing and creates additional work e.g. to remove spaces:
Olaf
Feature Req: exact shortcode from transformation
Re: Feature Req: exact shortcode from transformation
yeah, maybe we should revisit this. if you begin the shortcode with an underscore i think it will get rid of the spaces, but that's not really discoverable:
_INV
cheers
_INV
cheers
Re: Feature Req: exact shortcode from transformation
as a general rule, we like spaces because they make things easier to read.
Re: Feature Req: exact shortcode from transformation
Hi Jonathon,
agreed, but the user can still write " INV" (with space at the beginning) instead of "INV". And for me, if I want "_" instead of " - " space dash space, could simply use _INV.
I totally agree with you, that spaces make things easier to read - as long variable names make those easier to understand If, only if the user want's spaces, let him use those, that's ok, but if not, why not attach the postfix to the variable as is?
Olaf
agreed, but the user can still write " INV" (with space at the beginning) instead of "INV". And for me, if I want "_" instead of " - " space dash space, could simply use _INV.
I totally agree with you, that spaces make things easier to read - as long variable names make those easier to understand If, only if the user want's spaces, let him use those, that's ok, but if not, why not attach the postfix to the variable as is?
Olaf