Sidak Posthoc

Discuss the jamovi platform, possible improvements, etc.
Post Reply
cheng
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 4:59 am

Sidak Posthoc

Post by cheng »

Hi,

I was just wondering whether there were plans to add sidak posthoc tests?

Thanks,
Cheng
User avatar
Ravi
Posts: 194
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2017 11:18 am

Re: Sidak Posthoc

Post by Ravi »

No immediate plans no. You can make a case for it on our github page: https://github.com/jamovi/jamovi/issues
coledavis
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 1:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Sidak Posthoc

Post by coledavis »

Isn't the Sidak another name for the Holm? (Find the smallest p value and multiply by the number of pairings; find the next smallest and multiply by the number of pairings minus 1; and so on.)
User avatar
jonathon
Posts: 2613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2017 10:04 am

Re: Sidak Posthoc

Post by jonathon »

if that is true, we could change all the labels to 'holm / sidak'?
coledavis
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 1:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Sidak Posthoc

Post by coledavis »

Well, you will find references to the Holm-Sidak correction. I would feel happier, however, if one or two other people checked this.
User avatar
superyms
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:54 pm
Location: Algeria

Re: Sidak Posthoc

Post by superyms »

Hi,

Yes it is named Holm-Sidak, so you could use it like this.
However you have to know that there is another correction named with the same name (but no so totally), associated to Bonferroni test and in this case it is Šídák (the letter Š is pronounced "Sh").

I hope this would help ;)
User avatar
jonathon
Posts: 2613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2017 10:04 am

Re: Sidak Posthoc

Post by jonathon »

so which sidak did you mean, @cheng? :)

jonathon
Post Reply