Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner pairwise comparisons

Discuss statistics related things

by zafrin » Fri Aug 23, 2019 8:15 am

Good Morning everyone!

I was wondering if it is necessary to adjust alpha, after using Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner pairwise comparisons in the course of a Kruskal-Wallis-Test. I couldn't find any reference in literature if DSCF is correcting alpha simultaneously or if I should use Bonferroni or something like it instead to control the familywise error rate.

I'd appreciate any clue! Thank you!
zafrin
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2019 8:02 am

by jonathon » Sat Aug 24, 2019 11:29 am

a quick test. we get a larger p-value when comparing only two levels, than when comparing three, so it looks like a correction is in play:

Tooth Growth.omv
(3.84 KiB) Downloaded 7 times


Screen Shot 2019-08-24 at 21.25.01.png
Screen Shot 2019-08-24 at 21.25.01.png (843.44 KiB) Viewed 91 times


cheers

jonathon
User avatar
jonathon
 
Posts: 895
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2017 10:04 am

by coledavis » Mon Aug 26, 2019 9:41 am

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10. ... 9108830487

I believe that family-wise error rate is built in.
coledavis
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 1:35 pm


Return to Statistics