Hey everybody,
I redid an old analysis and could not reproduce it. In the beginning I opend the .csv file completly new in jamovi where I copuld not reprouce the results.
But I was also able to reproduce the unreproducibility within the original jamovi file. Even renaming factors so that (as it appears) the analysis runs again, did not change the old values.
I removed all uniformative stuff for the ease of comparability, so that the first rmANOVA is from April '17 and the second one is from today. I did compare several things, including the syntax or with JASP-Anaylsis (which is identical with the "newer" one), but could not spot anything suspicous. Was there a bug I did not know about? Or is it me overseeing the obvious?
Please have a look and tell me. I tried to figure it out for way to long by now...
Best
Jonas
[SOLVED] old (04/17) analysis gives different values then cu
[SOLVED] old (04/17) analysis gives different values then cu
- Attachments
-
- dferror.omv
- Compare first (from April '17) with second (from today) rmANOVA.
- (26.91 KiB) Downloaded 390 times
Re: old (04/17) analysis gives different values then current
hi jonas,
in the first analysis you have the columns assigned;
fp.out.face => out, male, face
fp.out.eyes => out, male, eyes
fp.out.mouth => out, male, mouth
fp.out.glabella => out, male, glabella
where as the latter you have:
fp.m.out.face => out, male, face
fp.m.out.eyes => out, male, eyes
fp.m.out.mouth => out, male, mouth
fp.m.out.glabella => out, male, glabella
(the additional 'm')
does that account for it?
cheers
jonathon
in the first analysis you have the columns assigned;
fp.out.face => out, male, face
fp.out.eyes => out, male, eyes
fp.out.mouth => out, male, mouth
fp.out.glabella => out, male, glabella
where as the latter you have:
fp.m.out.face => out, male, face
fp.m.out.eyes => out, male, eyes
fp.m.out.mouth => out, male, mouth
fp.m.out.glabella => out, male, glabella
(the additional 'm')
does that account for it?
cheers
jonathon
Re: old (04/17) analysis gives different values then current
So sorry!! Yes, that's it. I knew it was the past-me, that evil guy.
Thanks a lot for your quick response!
Jonas
Thanks a lot for your quick response!
Jonas