UncertainInterval
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 8:19 am
Dear Youri,
I hope this message finds you well.
Thank you again for your outstanding work on the jYS module in Jamovi.
I would like to suggest adding a new feature to your module, inspired by the R package UncertainInterval (https://github.com/HansLandsheer/UncertainInterval). This package allows for the definition of a "gray zone" around test scores—a three-zone approach (positive, uncertain, or negative)—which is particularly useful for interpreting test results, especially in a medical diagnostic context.
Integrating this feature into jYS could offer several significant advantages:
Explicit identification of uncertainty: By clearly distinguishing “inconclusive” scores, it enhances analytical rigor and reduces the risk of misinterpretation near threshold values.
Improved clinical decision-making: A three-zone approach (positive/uncertain/negative) helps avoid overly simplistic binary classifications.
Thank you again for your attention and openness to innovation.
Kind regards,
I hope this message finds you well.
Thank you again for your outstanding work on the jYS module in Jamovi.
I would like to suggest adding a new feature to your module, inspired by the R package UncertainInterval (https://github.com/HansLandsheer/UncertainInterval). This package allows for the definition of a "gray zone" around test scores—a three-zone approach (positive, uncertain, or negative)—which is particularly useful for interpreting test results, especially in a medical diagnostic context.
Integrating this feature into jYS could offer several significant advantages:
Explicit identification of uncertainty: By clearly distinguishing “inconclusive” scores, it enhances analytical rigor and reduces the risk of misinterpretation near threshold values.
Improved clinical decision-making: A three-zone approach (positive/uncertain/negative) helps avoid overly simplistic binary classifications.
Thank you again for your attention and openness to innovation.
Kind regards,