Page 1 of 1
Fisher exact test statistic
Posted: Sat May 28, 2022 3:48 pm
by JorgeCamachoS
Dear Jamoviers:
Past versions of jamovi included the value of Fisher exact test statistic as well the associate probability. The 2.3.9 version include de probability but not the statistic value. Could you include this value?
Thanks in advance for your support
Jorge Camacho
Re: Fisher exact test statistic
Posted: Sun May 29, 2022 5:08 am
by reason180
There's a test statistic for Fisher's exact test?
Re: Fisher exact test statistic
Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 11:59 pm
by jonathon
Past versions of jamovi included the value of Fisher exact test statistic as well the associate probability. The 2.3.9 version include de probability but not the statistic value. Could you include this value?
i don't think we've changed anything here ... are you saying an option that used to be there, is no longer there?
jonathon
Re: Fisher exact test statistic
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2022 2:51 am
by JorgeCamachoS
Dear Jonathon:
In an old analysis, using a past version of Jamovi, I got a value for Fisher Exact test as well as the related probability. The 2 x 2 table was:
Output1 Output2
Trat1 9 3
Trat2 4 9
The statistics value was 6.181 and the probability 0.0472.
Thanks for your support
Jorge Camacho
Re: Fisher exact test statistic
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2022 9:26 pm
by MAgojam
Hey Jorge,
the elegant question from @reason180
reason180 wrote:There's a test statistic for Fisher's exact test?
suggests that there is no statistic for Fisher's exact test.
The reported value, returned from the
stats::fisher.test(...)$estimate test used, for a 2x2 table was the
odds ratio, but in a larger table it was always NULL.
The exact test does not have a statistic, it directly provides a p-value.
I believe there was a fix for the contingency table in jamovi's v1.6.5 that changed the code to only show the p-value for the exact test (Value always blank) to avoid misunderstanding with the estimation as Value.
Take a look at the screenshot.

- Fisher's exact test.png (70.29 KiB) Viewed 11025 times
Cheers,
Maurizio
Re: Fisher exact test statistic
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2022 11:14 pm
by reason180
I used to think I understood Fisher' exact test, but now I don't think I do. I've been under the impression that Fisher's exact test is a special case of a permutation test. See
https://journals.physiology.org/doi/pdf ... 00072.2012
However, if that's true, there would need to be a test statistic. For example:
When all possible re-pairings of the levels of the X variable with the levels of the Y variable, ____% of the time is the observed difference between two proportions at least as large as it was prior to the re-pairings. So I wonder if either the odds ratio is THE permutation test statistic, if the difference between two proportions is THE permutation statistic, or if the result is the same regardless of which of those statistics is used? (Presumably the odds ratio and the difference between two proportions are monotonic functions of each other.)
Re: Fisher exact test statistic
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:10 am
by JorgeCamachoS
Dear reason180:
Thanks for your reply about Fisher exact test
Best regards,
Jorge Camacho S