Page 1 of 1
Correspondence Analysis
Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 9:44 am
by Beth
Hi,
I'm trying to run a correspondence analysis on Jamovi. I followed an example (https://sebastien-le.github.io/medasite/CA.html) I found online, and even though my data seems appropriate for the analysis, I get an error message "non convenient data".
I added the nominal variable as the row labels and the scale variables as active columns.
I also tried changing the data setup but I still got the same error. Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong, please?
Re: Correspondence Analysis
Posted: Tue May 02, 2023 10:41 am
by seol
Hi Beth
Have you tried 'snowCluster' module for correspondence analysis?
Best
Seol
Re: Correspondence Analysis
Posted: Wed May 03, 2023 8:28 pm
by Beth
seol wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 10:41 am
Hi Beth
Have you tried 'snowCluster' module for correspondence analysis?
Best
Seol
Hi Seol,
I installed and tried it after your suggestion. I'm very new to data analysis so excuse me if I'm missing something very obvious but I'm a bit confused about this. I'm getting "the following variables are not quantitative" warning for the nominal variable section. I have a summary table data as seen on the screenshot. I did the analysis on SPSS, but I guess the data setup must be different in Jamovi? I'd appreciate it a lot if you could explain a bit.
Thanks for your help,
Beth
Re: Correspondence Analysis
Posted: Wed May 03, 2023 9:54 pm
by seol
Hi
I think you need at least 3 nominal variables to run. you can try it using example data within snowClustermodule; Open>Data Library> Multivariate analysis.
Best Regards
Seol
Re: Correspondence Analysis
Posted: Thu May 04, 2023 10:21 am
by Beth
seol wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 9:54 pm
Hi
I think you need at least 3 nominal variables to run. you can try it using example data within snowClustermodule; Open>Data Library> Multivariate analysis.
Best Regards
Seol
Hi Seol,
Thanks for your suggestion, I checked the example and it turns out the frequencies need to be nominal variables instead of scale. Once I converted them the analysis worked.
I still couldn't figure out why the MEDA module correspondence analysis doesn't work because my data looks exactly like the example but I get the "non-convenient" warning. I did the analysis on snowcluster but I'd still appreciate it if anyone can explain why this is the case.
Best,
Beth
Re: Correspondence Analysis
Posted: Fri May 05, 2023 7:15 am
by sle
Hi Beth,
you have to put at least 2 active columns.
If you could send me the data I can check, but it should work fine.