Estimated marginal means output
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2023 2:00 pm
Hello,
I am new to jamovi/stats so please bear with. I am having some issues with the estimated marginal means feature. For 1 of my 6 experimental conditions ("Cond#2, Incompatible") the mean value being included into the estimated marginal means output is a very small negative number, despite the actual mean value for this condition in the descriptives table being 961.
I'm not sure where jamovi is getting this number from but it it incorrect and does not correspond to the true mean value for the experimental condition. It is especially confusing as the remaining 5 mean values in the estimated marginal means output correspond perfectly to those in the descriptives. It is just this 1 value that seems to be problematic. This incorrect, small mean value is also distorting the estimated marginal means plot.
I have attached screenshots of the estimated marginal means output and my descriptives table for reference.
Any advice on how to resolve this would be massively appreciated!
Thanks,
Tom.
I am new to jamovi/stats so please bear with. I am having some issues with the estimated marginal means feature. For 1 of my 6 experimental conditions ("Cond#2, Incompatible") the mean value being included into the estimated marginal means output is a very small negative number, despite the actual mean value for this condition in the descriptives table being 961.
I'm not sure where jamovi is getting this number from but it it incorrect and does not correspond to the true mean value for the experimental condition. It is especially confusing as the remaining 5 mean values in the estimated marginal means output correspond perfectly to those in the descriptives. It is just this 1 value that seems to be problematic. This incorrect, small mean value is also distorting the estimated marginal means plot.
I have attached screenshots of the estimated marginal means output and my descriptives table for reference.
Any advice on how to resolve this would be massively appreciated!
Thanks,
Tom.