Tests of normalities
Re: Tests of normalities
hi,
if you have your p-value settings set to 'significant figures', then small values will be represented with scientific notation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientifi ... E-notation). you change these to 'decimal places' if you prefer the < .001.
cheers
jonathon
if you have your p-value settings set to 'significant figures', then small values will be represented with scientific notation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientifi ... E-notation). you change these to 'decimal places' if you prefer the < .001.
cheers
jonathon
Re: Tests of normalities
Hi, pullume.pullume wrote: However im getting something totally different for my assignment analysis.
I get these results with e's in them - 6.720e-7 and 1.722e-4 . Can you explain these please?
Your p values, to make them more readable, are reported as "Scientific notation", which reduces the number of zero decimals to be displayed.
Your values ...
without e-7 they would be
0.000000672
without e-4 they would be
0.0001722
Cheer.
Maurizio
Re: Tests of normalities
Dear Maurizio,MAgojam wrote:Hi, pullume.pullume wrote: However im getting something totally different for my assignment analysis.
I get these results with e's in them - 6.720e-7 and 1.722e-4 . Can you explain these please?
Your p values, to make them more readable, are reported as "Scientific notation", which reduces the number of zero decimals to be displayed.
Your values ...
without e-7 they would be
0.000000672
without e-4 they would be
0.0001722
Cheer.
Maurizio
I can't thank you enough!
xxx
Re: Tests of normalities
I've just tried this on jamovi 1.2.2 and asking for Shapiro-Wilk in Linear Regression doesn't give the K-S test, whereas it does in Independent Samples T-Testjonathon wrote:hi,
moretests is what we call an "addon", where it adds results to existing analyses. just run the t-test or ANOVA as usual, and choose 'normality tests' (granted, there's an issue with 'normality tests' still be labeled as shapiro-wilk). see here:
cheers
jonathon
Cheers,
Wake
Re: Tests of normalities
Hey there, wondering if you'd consider also adding the normality tests S-W and K-S to the Descriptives and Repeated Measures ANOVA (I'm using the latter for a Mixed/Factorial ANOVA)?Wake wrote:I've just tried this on jamovi 1.2.2 and asking for Shapiro-Wilk in Linear Regression doesn't give the K-S test, whereas it does in Independent Samples T-Testjonathon wrote:hi,
moretests is what we call an "addon", where it adds results to existing analyses. just run the t-test or ANOVA as usual, and choose 'normality tests' (granted, there's an issue with 'normality tests' still be labeled as shapiro-wilk). see here:
cheers
jonathon
Cheers,
Wake
Thanks
Loraine
Re: Tests of normalities
yeah, i'd love to, but haven't had the time to yet, sorry.
will hopefully get to it in the next few weeks.
cheers
will hopefully get to it in the next few weeks.
cheers
Re: Tests of normalities
I found different result of Shapiro-W when tested in descriptive option and in independent t test option. It made me confused.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2020 3:50 pm
Re: Tests of normalities
I computed a Z-Score using the built-in formula. When I look at the Descriptors table I should have a mean of zero, but it displays in Scientific Notation even though I have the format set to DP
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2022 4:19 am
Re: Tests of normalities
Hi Dear
I newbie for using Jamovi
I use normality test
What the mean "W" value in normality test on Shapiro_Wilk?
I newbie for using Jamovi
I use normality test
What the mean "W" value in normality test on Shapiro_Wilk?
Re: Tests of normalities
hi,
this is an old thread. could you start a new one next time?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapiro%E2%80%93Wilk_test#Theory
with thanks
this is an old thread. could you start a new one next time?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapiro%E2%80%93Wilk_test#Theory
with thanks