Thank you! I wouldn't have thought to try that.
Marju
Search found 20 matches
- Sat Apr 04, 2026 9:27 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: snowIRT graph re-size function no longer available
- Replies: 4
- Views: 22260
- Fri Apr 03, 2026 7:05 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: snowIRT graph re-size function no longer available
- Replies: 4
- Views: 22260
Re: snowIRT graph re-size function no longer available
I currently have version 2.7.23.
- Sun Mar 29, 2026 8:51 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: snowIRT graph re-size function no longer available
- Replies: 4
- Views: 22260
snowIRT graph re-size function no longer available
Hi. I downloaded the most recent version of jamovi and discovered that the graph re-size functions in snowIRT, for example, are no longer available. Would it be possible to make the resize option available for the different analyses included in the modules? It was really useful since I often have lo...
- Wed Apr 09, 2025 11:47 am
- Forum: jamovi development
- Topic: Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)
- Replies: 23
- Views: 422527
Re: Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)
Hi Seol I have a few questions about the MFRM module to make sure I'm using it correctly. First, scores: I read that in case of TAM (I understand this is the package the MFRM module is based on), the lowest score on the scale should be 0. So, if in practice the lowest score I can give for a performa...
- Fri Aug 16, 2024 12:59 pm
- Forum: Module development
- Topic: option to link tests via common item
- Replies: 1
- Views: 48183
option to link tests via common item
Hi There are a few options in the snowIRT module to link different measurement instruments. Would it be possible to add a new one that is based on the principles outlined in Engelhard and Wang's book "Rasch Models for Solving Measurement Problems: Invariant Measurement in the Social Sciences&qu...
- Sun Feb 11, 2024 7:56 pm
- Forum: jamovi development
- Topic: snowIRT distractor analysis
- Replies: 6
- Views: 117395
Re: snowIRT distractor analysis
Hi Seol, Thank you for your suggestion, I also thought that would be a way to solve it. I have created the 'level' filters as I'm also interested in the relevant descriptive statistics. It is just that the group-level info is so nicely presented in the table and gives a really good overview of how t...
- Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:16 pm
- Forum: jamovi development
- Topic: snowIRT distractor analysis
- Replies: 6
- Views: 117395
Re: snowIRT distractor analysis
Hi Seol, I would like to ask whether it would be possible to add an option to the distractor analysis. Currently, it is possible to specify the number of groups under the Total summary and I'm assuming the program takes into account the total score achieved on the measure and then creates the groups...
- Wed Dec 20, 2023 5:27 pm
- Forum: jamovi development
- Topic: snowIRT distractor analysis
- Replies: 6
- Views: 117395
Re: snowIRT distractor analysis
Hi Seol,
Thank you, I think this is exactly what I was looking for.
All the best
Marju
Thank you, I think this is exactly what I was looking for.
All the best
Marju
- Thu Dec 14, 2023 8:15 am
- Forum: jamovi development
- Topic: snowIRT distractor analysis
- Replies: 6
- Views: 117395
snowIRT distractor analysis
Hi Would it be possible to add an additional type of analysis to the one for distractors? In my context (language assessment) I want to get the item-rest value not just for the correct option but also for the distractors. This means that the incorrect options are treated as correct and the outcome h...
- Wed Aug 30, 2023 10:48 am
- Forum: jamovi development
- Topic: Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)
- Replies: 23
- Views: 422527
Re: Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)
Hi Seol,
I work in the field of language assessment and have very limited knowledge in R. I found one tutorial on rpubs (https://rpubs.com/isbell_daniel/735520) where MFRM was tried out with R. Is this useful?
Best
Marju
I work in the field of language assessment and have very limited knowledge in R. I found one tutorial on rpubs (https://rpubs.com/isbell_daniel/735520) where MFRM was tried out with R. Is this useful?
Best
Marju