Reorder output

[reason180]

[raimoi]

+1

[reason180]

Perhaps an easy, interim change to jamovi would be to have duplicated analyses get copied to the bottom of the output window rather than immediately below the original. That way, after having done some analyses, the user could opt to duplicate the analyses in any arbitrary order and then delete the originals, leaving the just the arbitrarily ordered duplicates.

+1.

[reason180]

FYI. I notice that a platform similar to jamovi puts duplicated analyses at the bottom of the output window (rather than immediately beneath the copied analysis), and this simple change does work well to let the user reorder (indirectly) the entire set of analyses.

[uirmda]

Upvoting this suggestion. The capability to re-order analyses in some way, either with duplication to end, copy/paste in report, or drag/drop, would be immensely helpful for making a "final results report" with analysis in a logical order.

[reason180]

I found a non-technical work-around: I simply include a 'table of contents' telling the reader wear to look in the numbered-but-out-of-order analyses. For example . . .

RESULTS

Contents

Response Time

• General Descriptives for RT (#5)

• ANOVA of RT (#3)

• Rj planned comparisons for ANOVA of RT (#6)

Accuracy

• General Descriptives for Accuracy (#1)

• ANOVA of Accuracy (#2)

• Rj planned comparisons for ANOVA of Accuracy (#4)

[reason180]

Here's another alternative workaround:

Make sure the very first "analysis" is an Rj+ syntax window. You can use in for creating new, computed variable's or whatever you want. When your done with all of your jamovi analyses, you can get the syntax for each analysis and paste it into the Rj+ window. There, you can order the analyses however you like. Alternatively, you could duplicate the Rj+ window to obtain a series of syntax-editing windows. The end result is an initial portion of the output that consists of (syntax-generated) analyses in their desired order, followed by GUI-versions of the same analyses that may be in an undesired order.

[somereve]

Please add this feature! Especially for all of the open science researchers who want to share data so being able to organize everything at the end would be super beneficial! Thanks for all of the hard work.

[jonathon]

yup, we're definitely getting closer to implementing this.

jonathon