ClinicoPathDescriptives v0.0.3.90 ready for testing

[sbalci]

The descriptive functions in #ClinicoPathDescriptives module for #jamovi 2.7.2 is ready for comments and feedbacks.
There are new features for pathology and oncology research. Waterfall, Spider, and Swimmer Plots are added. vartree is now using the latest version.
https://github.com/sbalci/ClinicoPathDe ... /v0.0.3.90
You can download .jmo files and use sideload to use the module.
https://www.serdarbalci.com/ClinicoPath ... deload.gif
#statistics #biostatistics #pathology #pathologists #oncology #oncologists

[vinschger]

Thank you for all your efforts and time in continuously improving these modules.

[sbalci]

thank you. I hope they make your research easy

[sbalci]

a recent update to ClinicoPathDescriptives. Will be in library soon. open for comments:
https://github.com/sbalci/ClinicoPathDe ... v0.0.31.73

[yurismol]

Beautiful plots and commentary texts!
But many of the results are in R output text format (preformatted).
I understand that this speeds up module development.

[yurismol]

Venn Diagram:
- "show percentage labels" checkbox doesn't effect
- can you extend to more than four levels?

[sbalci]

Beautiful plots and commentary texts!
But many of the results are in R output text format (preformatted).
I understand that this speeds up module development.

Thank you.
For modules I use packages that I use for my own research. So there are many packages and their outputs. It is not being jamovi style, I am trying to make it look jamovian as much as possible.
When packages change this becomes problematic though.

Venn Diagram:
- "show percentage labels" checkbox doesn't effect

It should change the upset plots not venn diagrams, I may need to work on it.

Venn Diagram:
- can you extend to more than four levels?

More than 4 levels leads to very bizzare shapes: https://gaospecial.github.io/ggVennDiag ... -sets.html
Though I may try it.
And I have to figure out input more than 4 variable, and each has its own variable level. Should I force users to use only one positive levels for all variables?
I will think on that.