Multiple comparision correction

Discuss the jamovi platform, possible improvements, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
yurismol
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat May 27, 2023 6:40 am
Location: Chita
Contact:

Multiple comparision correction

Post by yurismol »

Jamovi has a strange attitude toward adjusting for multiple comparisons.
I sincerely understand the debatability and complexity of this issue.
It would be helpful to allow the user to decide whether to adjust for multiple comparisons and provide a universal tool for various types of analysis.
Less crude methods derivated from Bonferroni have been described successively (by year): Bonferroni (1961), Holm (1979), Hochberg (1988), Hommel (1988), Benjamini-Hochberg (1995), Benjamini-Yekutieli (2001).
I don't understand the sporadic appearance of this method (One-Way ANOVA -> Dunn's pairwise comparison -> P(Bonferoni) column)

Only one function is needed to adjust calculated p-values:

Code: Select all

p.adjust(p, method = p.adjust.methods, n = length(p))
# p.adjust.methods
# c("holm", "hochberg", "hommel", "bonferroni", "BH", "BY",
#   "fdr", "none")
I implemented this in a function Correlation Clastering in the jYS module.
Attachments
Dunn.png
Dunn.png (121.82 KiB) Viewed 735 times
Multiple Comparision.png
Multiple Comparision.png (168.89 KiB) Viewed 735 times
Post Reply