q value in cross tables

General help and assistance with jamovi. Bug reports can be made at our issues page: https://github.com/jamovi/jamovi/issues . (If you're unsure feel free to discuss it here)
Post Reply
Hazal
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2025 10:00 pm

q value in cross tables

Post by Hazal »

Hello!

I would like to ask 2 questions:

Someone once showed me that it was possible to get p and q values with gtsummary table style in cross tables with clinicopath, but I cannot get them anymore, and even when I modify the Jamovi file with those values that person had sent me, the values disappear. I have updated to jamovi version 2.6.44 but nothing changes, I can only get p values with other table styles, but none of them gives any q values... (I have no missing data on my file, I have 14 dependent variables). Does anyone know what I can do to get those p and q values?

The other question is, (I'm sorry I'm not any good with statistics and all this is too complicated for me :tired_face: ) I think I need to do the Bonferroni correction on my p values, as I have many variables (I have done Chi² tests and binomial logistic regressions), in order to get rid of the false positives, but are the p values Jamovi calculates already include the Bonferroni correction or do I have to do it myself, and how can I do it?

Thank you soooo much :hugging:
Hazal
sbalci
Posts: 134
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2018 10:25 pm
Contact:

Re: q value in cross tables

Post by sbalci »

Hello,

Thank you for reporting this. I will check the gtsummary style functon.

For Chi-Square posthoc tests recent jamovi includes residuals method in analyses -> Frequencies --> Independent samples.

For the method you are asking. Suppose you have 3x2 table. You should convert them by eliminating each raw one by one. You will have 3 2x2 table. Run ChiSquare on them. Divide your p value cut-off 0.05 by 3 and accept this as the new cut-off.

These are all very controversial topics in statistics. Please consult a (bio)statistician. And make sure that the tables and subgroups really make a real world sense. Do not just rely on p values with Bonferroni correction.
Post Reply